From 750a57287311346ce81723ff41a9ce0df4cc0e6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Fiddaman <omnios@citrus-it.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 18:19:36 +0000
Subject: We never want to omit the frame pointer, regardless of
the optimisation level or options to gcc - we like stack traces too much and
it is of questionable benefit anyway, even on i386.
---
gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc | 9 +++++++++
gcc/opts.cc | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- gcc-releases-gcc-14.3.0/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc.orig
+++ gcc-releases-gcc-14.3.0/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc
@@ -3264,6 +3264,15 @@
free (str);
}
+ /*
+ * We never want to omit the frame pointer, regardless of the optimisation
+ * level or options to gcc - we like stack traces too much and it is of
+ * questionable benefit anyway, even on i386.
+ */
+
+ flag_omit_frame_pointer = 0;
+ opts->x_flag_omit_frame_pointer = 0;
+
/* Save the initial options in case the user does function specific
options. */
if (main_args_p)
--- gcc-releases-gcc-14.3.0/gcc/opts.cc.orig
+++ gcc-releases-gcc-14.3.0/gcc/opts.cc
@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@
{ OPT_LEVELS_1_PLUS, OPT_fipa_reference, NULL, 1 },
{ OPT_LEVELS_1_PLUS, OPT_fipa_reference_addressable, NULL, 1 },
{ OPT_LEVELS_1_PLUS, OPT_fmerge_constants, NULL, 1 },
- { OPT_LEVELS_1_PLUS, OPT_fomit_frame_pointer, NULL, 1 },
+ { OPT_LEVELS_1_PLUS, OPT_fomit_frame_pointer, NULL, 0 },
{ OPT_LEVELS_1_PLUS, OPT_freorder_blocks, NULL, 1 },
{ OPT_LEVELS_1_PLUS, OPT_fshrink_wrap, NULL, 1 },
{ OPT_LEVELS_1_PLUS, OPT_fsplit_wide_types, NULL, 1 },
@@ -617,6 +617,7 @@
{ OPT_LEVELS_1_PLUS_NOT_DEBUG, OPT_ftree_pta, NULL, 1 },
{ OPT_LEVELS_1_PLUS_NOT_DEBUG, OPT_ftree_sra, NULL, 1 },
+
/* -O2 and -Os optimizations. */
{ OPT_LEVELS_2_PLUS, OPT_fcaller_saves, NULL, 1 },
{ OPT_LEVELS_2_PLUS, OPT_fcode_hoisting, NULL, 1 },